critical appraisal summarizing the contents of Chapter 2

 

Write a critical appraisal summarizing the contents of Chapter 2 (including the related sections). In your summary, identify at least three (3) weaknesses discussed in the reading and use a minimum of five (5) scholarly sources to expand the discussion and address the weaknesses.

 

NOTE:  Collegiate writing standards apply.

Contact us at Premiumessaysonline@gmail.com

Use your knowledge to develop the circumstances and details involved in a federal case against a fictitious criminal offender

  • Use your knowledge to develop the circumstances and details involved in a federal case against a fictitious criminal offender. In your assignment, provide a description of the criminal offender, including the type of crime committed and the charge handed down by law enforcement.
  • Then, explain the circumstances and details of the federal case tracing the chronological events from lowest possible level to the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Be sure to cite all references in APA format.

Contact us at Premiumessaysonline@gmail.com

2. According to the textbook what is erotomania

1. According to the textbook explain the controversy that exists between the child abuse model and spousal abuse model, in relation to how they are used to address the needs of the older victim?

 

 

 

2. According to the textbook what is erotomania

 

 

 

3. According to the textbook does prosecution of domestic violence offenders deter future abuse?

 

 

 

4. According to the textbook from a comparison of court outcomes for those charged with aggravated assault, is there any difference when the assault was perpetrated by a family member, intimate partner, or cohabitant? (explain)

5. The author(s) of the text puts forth the Six Step Model for Evaluating Internet Sources are: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How to determine the reliability of the author; the purpose of the information; where it originated; the timeliness of the information; its believability; and whether it will add to the research project you are conducting.  After reviewing the reading for week 8, as well as any discussion articles located in the lesson for this week, discuss with your classmates these steps and the online sources you trust to obtain reliable scholarly data and/or information pertaining to criminal justice and why.

ALL QUESTIONS MINIMUM OF 600 WORDS

APA 6TH EDITION FORMAT

NO REFERENCES OLDER THE 2007

 

Contact us at Premiumessaysonline@gmail.com

What do you see as the top three most important trends?

According to your text on page 502, a report of the top 10 most important future trends in policing were provided.

Write a 2 page paper.  Address the following in your paper:

  • What do you see as the top three most important trends?
  • Why are these important trends?

Include a title page and 3-5 references.  Only one reference can be from the internet (not Wikipedia).  The other references must be from the Grantham University online Library. Please adhere to the American Psychological Association (APA) 6th edition, 2nd printing when writing and submitting papers. Papers should be grammatically correct.  Lastly, avoid first person and contractions in your paper. You can provide an opinion without using “I think” statements.

 Contac us at Premiumessaysonline@gmail.com

Scientific Journal Article Review

Scientific research is conducted in an attempt to answer a pressing question within a specific discipline. Following completion of a study, results are generally submitted to a peer reviewed journal and, if accepted, are published for other researchers to read and build upon. Thus, being able to read and understand scientific journal articles is a vital skill in the biological and environmental sciences. For this assignment, you are to read the article “Assessment of nitrogen flows into the Cuban landscape,” written by Julio Baisre, and published in the peer reviewed journal, Biogeochemistry in 2006. Then, write a paper summarizing the article by addressing each of the four topics below.

  1. Summarize the question being addressed in the research and describe the methods used to evaluate this question.
  2. Summarize the researcher’s findings and whether or not those findings answer the questions being addressed.
  3. Identify what research has been conducted on the subject. Refer to the ProQuest database in the Ashford Library to find and describe some of the similar studies recently published.
  4. Often the results of one study lead to the beginning of another. Predict additional questions that might be raised by the article’s results.

While you may not be able to understand all of the technical language in the article, try to focus on the big picture, such as methods utilized, results identified, and the overall message being conveyed.

Your paper must be three to five pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Additionally, you must use at least three scholarly sources to provide sufficient details of the topics listed above. All sources must be properly cited in text as well as on the reference page.

ATTACHED IS THE RESOURCE. ATTACHED IS THE GRADING RUBICS SO YOU KNOW WHAT IS NEEDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. MUST USE AT LEAST 3 RESOURCES MUST ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE ASSIGNMENT

Attachments:
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document icongrading_rubics_for_week2_assignment.docx

SAFETY ENGINEERING

As part of the Hearing Conservation Program, the employer is required to evaluate the effectiveness of any hearing protection provided to employees. Hearing protectors are rated using a system developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), know as the noise reduction rating (NRR). The NRR is derived in a laboratory setting. There is some controversy about the reported accuracy of the NRR. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing protection includes subtracting seven from the NRR to account for “real-world” versus a laboratory setting.

For OSHA compliance officers, OSHA divides the result in half before subtracting from the exposure level to account for individual improperly inserting the hearing protection. OSHA does not currently require employers to divide the result in half.

 

 

 

1. Which method of evaluation of hearing protection devices do you think employers should be required to use and why?

 

2. Do you think there is a better way to evaluate hearing protection devices? Please explain your response. 

one page

Unit 5 Safety

You have been hired as a consultant to help a local machine shop solve a hazardous noise problem. The shop is 10,000 square feet in area, with 12-foot-high concrete block walls and a flat metal roof. Inside the shop are two band saws, two metal lathes, three drill presses, one milling machine, and three abrasive grinders. The six employees work at benches located throughout the shop, using a variety of pneumatic-powered hand tools and non-powered tools. A recent noise survey found sound pressure levels exceeding 100dBA in some parts of the shop. All employees were monitored for noise exposure over an eight-hour workday, and the calculated TWA for noise for the employees ranged from 88dBA to 97dBA. Determine a possible control measure for each of the six levels in the hierarchy of controls (p. 273 in your textbook), and explain the reasoning behind each choice. Which control measure(s) would you recommend to the machine shop manager?

Your response must be at least 200 words in length.

 

Select a workplace hazard with which you are familiar. Using the problem solving methodology below, discuss how you would approach each step for the hazard you selected.

  1. Identify the problem.
  2. Analyze the problem.
  3. Explore alternative solutions.
  4. Select a plan and take action.
  5. Examine the effects of the actions taken.