Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Student’s Name

Professor’s Name



Rhetorical Analysis Essay

In the age of information where individuals claim the competence and right to inform people, there is need to analyze the method information are presented to avoid the possibility of consuming junk information. This paper is a rhetorical analysis Dan Pinks speech on “The Puzzle of Motivation” and Christine Porath’s article on “No Time to be Nice at Work”.

The information is presented in exemplary strategy. Rather than just using persuasive skills, the authors employed statistics, personal experiences, case studies and facts from the professional point of view. For example, Pink cites Professor Glucksberg experiment to justify his belief and free knowledge (TEDGLOBAL, N.P). Furthermore, in his speech, Pink present’s instances that the audience can relate with and allow them to make judgment rather than forcing opinions on the public. Similarly, Porath uses close observation from his father’s misfortune. Besides Porath’s article present experts information that supports his arguments and provides academic case studies that apply to his subject matter to persuade readers to his viewpoint. Porath also uses the information of prominent individuals like Professor Robert M. Sapolsky arguments on the impacts of incivility (Porath, N.p).

Even though the messages were of different audiences, Porath and Pink recount events using stories. To some extent, Porath articles sound as if she is in touch with the audience (readers) while presenting information. She offers the possible counterarguments that people with a different idea may use to argue and refutes the fallacy of the counterarguments.  Pink’s speech also entails detailed procedures that are reliable for his argument.

In presenting information Pink and Porath stress keywords of their argument. The repetition of keywords helps the audience to maintain focus because the information provided compares, contrast provide an example and the audience are likely to lose focus of the main idea while following the argument. Therefore, Porath kept repeating the word incivility as Pink stressed on the term Mismatch.

Apart from artistic styles the two information appeal to pathos and logos to persuade the audience to their mode of arguments.  Pink and Pink and Porath succeed in convincing their audiences because they avoid forcing their opinions. They take the initiative of making a further study that validates their opinion.

Work Cited

Porath, Christine. “No Time To Be Nice At Work“. Incivility. N.p., 2015. Print.

TEDGlobal,. “The Puzzle Of Motivation”. 2009. Print.

Contact Us: premiumessaysonline@gmail.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s